<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Macallan 10 year-old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boysofbourbon.com/macallan-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boysofbourbon.com/macallan-10/</link>
	<description>The Definitive Bourbon Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tasting Notes and Review of Macallan Fine Oak 10 Years Whisky Scotch &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.boysofbourbon.com/macallan-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1840</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasting Notes and Review of Macallan Fine Oak 10 Years Whisky Scotch &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boysofbourbon.com/?p=117#comment-1840</guid>
		<description>[...] The Boys of Bourbon (great name!) approve of the whisky with its subtly sweet taste. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Boys of Bourbon (great name!) approve of the whisky with its subtly sweet taste. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M.</title>
		<link>http://www.boysofbourbon.com/macallan-10/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boysofbourbon.com/?p=117#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Their 10-year-old is good, but the 12 year-old is an order of magnitude better.

A couple more suggestions for novice Scotch drinkers:

* Highland Park 12 (mmmm - sweet &amp; a touch of smoke!)
* Balvenie DoubleWood (especially on the rocks)

They&#039;re both friendly and won&#039;t break the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their 10-year-old is good, but the 12 year-old is an order of magnitude better.</p>
<p>A couple more suggestions for novice Scotch drinkers:</p>
<p>* Highland Park 12 (mmmm &#8211; sweet &amp; a touch of smoke!)<br />
* Balvenie DoubleWood (especially on the rocks)</p>
<p>They&#8217;re both friendly and won&#8217;t break the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
